Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tristan Lamasine vs Marcin Gawron Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamasine vs Gawron analysis and find out who is favored!
Tristan Lamasine vs Marcin Gawron Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lamasine 1 - 1 Gawron
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamasine has won 48.74% of points on their second serve, while Gawron has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamasine, in recent form, has won 50.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gawron has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamasine has saved 55.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gawron has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamasine has won 64.1% of matches played (W/L 50/ 28), with Gawron winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 175/ 159). Gawron has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 45/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 241/ 168).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamasine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.41% of matches (W/L 31/ 23), where as Gawron has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lamasine winning 1 times and Gawron being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Lamasine winning 2 and Gawron winning 3. The last match between Lamasine and Gawron was at the Turkey F41, 14-10-2013, Semifinals, Hard with Tristan Lamasine getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamasine and Gawron have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lamasine winning 1 times and Gawron 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamasine winning 0, and Gawron 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamasine has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.72 while Gawron has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamasine has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gawron has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamasine has converted 44.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gawron has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
280
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
262
High
36
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
55% (422-345)
Career Total W/L
59% (341-238)
51% (21-20)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$160,780
Career Prize Money
$1,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tristan Lamasine vs Marcin Gawron For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lamasine VS Gawron
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Tristan Lamasine | Marcin Gawron |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 20 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tristan Lamasine | Marcin Gawron |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 51% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (46/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (448/449) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 27% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (17/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 115 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 128 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 239.27 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1760/2833) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1214/1760) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (523/1073) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (110/247) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1127/2882) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (21/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (20/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (21/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Florent Bax
Player
Tristan Lamasine
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Tristan Lamasine
46%
(
36 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Tristan Lamasine
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Tristan Lamasine
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Billy Harris
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Youssef Boubaker
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Tristan Lamasine
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcin Gawron Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Marcin Gawron
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcin Gawron
Player
Kacper Zuk
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Mazon-Hernandez
Player
Marcin Gawron
40%
(
38 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Marcin Gawron
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
42%
(
21 of
50)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Mertl
Player
Marcin Gawron
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Marcin Gawron
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
47)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Marcin Gawron
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Marcin Gawron
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marcin Gawron
Player
Ivan Endara
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
118)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamasine Vs Gawron Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lamasine are available here and Gawron photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tristan Lamasine
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
